|

Dιjΰ
vu all over again . . . Does
this quote sound familiar? "We meet this morning to hear the testimony
on the proper and improper use of drugs in athletic competition
and the related issue of the adequacy of current efforts to curb
the improper use of drugs by athletes. We are particularly interested
in these concerns as they pertain to college, high school and amateur
athletes, although, to be totally consistent, I think it is proper
to pursue the use or abuse, as it may exist or not exist, in the
professional ranks as well." So said Senator Birch Bayh, of Indiana,
at the opening of Senate hearings held by the Subcommittee to Investigate
Juvenile Delinquency. The date of the hearings was . . . June 18,
1973.
Add
hearings . . . Among the athletes who testified was sprinter
Eddie Hart, who told the committee, "The reason for athletes using
the drugs was simply because their competitors were using the drug,
and in order to obtain an equal advantage, they would take the drug
themselves." Sound familiar?
Last
hearings . . . Speaking of familiar sounding, this exchange
was between Senator Bayh and Dr. Carl S. Blyth of the NCAA Committee
on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports.
Dr.
Blyth - I think the State and local medical societies have to
take a firmer view against the unauthorized use of drugs. I think
that they have to have some guts about it and stop it where they
find it. I will give you one example
Senator
Bayh - Why should that take guts?
Dr.
Blyth - Courage then.
Senator
Bayh - Why should that take anything more than a normal amount
of determination to stop this kind of thing?
Dr.
Blyth - Too frequently we turn our back to it I guess.
Senator
Bayh - Because by gosh, if there is any area in which there
is a groundswell of public opinion, it is with regard to stopping
drug traffic, drug abuse, drug misuse. If there is anyplace we ought
to be able to command enough energy to get the job done, it ought
to be the area of athletics, which is supposed to
and I think basically does
epitomizes the finest in competition and good health and living
practices. Do we have a problem there of some people who are timid
in enforcing the prohibition of drug abuse in this area?
Dr.
Blyth - Well, the implication in these kinds of hearings is
that there is a problem. I am not convinced that the problem is
as serious as we have been led to believe in the newspapers.

Fool
me once . . . Some twenty years ago, author George Plimpton
fooled many sports experts with his brilliant Sports Illustrated
profile of Sidd Finch, a make-believe New York Mets phenom, published
on April Fools' Day. Not everyone learned from that lesson. This
year, competitive cycling magazine VeloNews
published an April Fools' story stating that International Cycling
Union President Hein Verbruggen was resigning and that World Anti-Doping
Agency head Dick Pound was going to replace him. Four days later,
the Boston Globe's Olympic beat-writer John Powers bit on the story
and reported that Pound was "likely to be named president [of the
UCI] as of the end of June." The following day, the Globe, citing
a "reporting error," published a correction.
Add
fool me . . . The VeloNews byline credited the article
to one "Philippe Farceur."
Sweatin'
it out . . . We're
not sure which of these two sporting competitions excited us more:
the 6th annual World Sauna Championships, held in, naturally, Heinola,
Finland, or the International Rock Paper Scissors Championships,
held in Toronto. Each of these competitions has its unique rules
and traditions. Indeed, despite the laid-back reputation of sauna
users, the rules are strict. According
to the website, "Before going to the sauna the competitors will
have to wash up in the facilities provided by the organizers. The
competitor must wear a normal swimsuit. In men's swimsuit the length
of the trouser leg must be under 200 millimeters (measured from
the middle seam of the trousers). The width of the women's swimsuits
sleeves must be under 50 millimeters and there can be no collars
in the swimsuits. . . . The competitors will have to sit in the
sauna with buttocks and thighs on the seat. Posture must be erect;
forearms must stay on the knees and arms have to be in an upright
position. Touching skin with hand is forbidden. Disturbing the other
competitors in the sauna in any way is strictly forbidden." And
you thought the PGA were sticklers.
Add
sweatin' . . . The RPS, meanwhile, is steeped in tradition.
The organization's website, reports that the World RPS Society traces
its roots to the Paper Scissors Stone Club, founded in London in
1842. An
article in Think Three Magazine , "the leading periodical resource
on RPS strategy, culture and style since it began publishing in
the early 1920's," states that the organization has been unable
to discover RPS' origins. That has led to problems. The issue of
"which culture actually 'invented' the game has been considered
by many to be the underlying cause for several of today's most heated
national rivalries on the World RPS Pro circuit." We're pretty sure
this isn't an April Fools article.
Department
of Bad Timing . . . For
its 2005 Major League Soccer preview issue, Soccer America magazine
ran a split cover featuring two prominent forwards: D.C. United's
Freddy Adu and the Los Angeles Galaxy's Carlos Ruiz. Unfortunately,
the Galaxy traded Ruiz to FC Dallas before the season started.
Mowing
them down . . . Lawn mower and engine manufacturer Briggs
& Stratton is sponsoring a program called "Diamonds in the Rough."
For the second consecutive year, the company is soliciting 150-word
essays from children ages 7 to 12 about their local ball fields.
The
company's website says winners are eligible for "$5,000 worth
of refurbishment to their local ball field" in the following cities:
Atlanta, Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, Detroit,
Houston, Miami, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, St. Louis,
Tampa and Washington D.C.
Add
mowing . . . One grand prize winner will be "awarded
$20,000 to refurbish their baseball field, as well as a clinic from
Major League Baseball Hall of Famers, Lou Brock and Carlton Fisk."
That would be the Lou Brock who played much of his career as a St.
Louis Cardinal on an artificial surface.
The
long wait is over . . .The
NFL recently released "Autumn Thunder: 40 Years of NFL Films Music,"
a 10-CD package that features a whopping 182 tunes. With such song
titles as "Forearm Shiver," "Gut Pride," and "Headcracker Suite,"
it's obvious that "Autumn Thunder" isn't for the faint of heart.
As
Tom Hedden, the NFL Films' director of music, put it, "Whether
it's one of Sam Spence's classic folk-song inspired tracks from
the late 1960s or one of Dave Robidoux's massive heart-pounders
from the late '90s, this music is designed to grab football fans
by the subconscious and drag them right into the middle of the play!"
And,
action . . . In January, acclaimed filmmaker Ken Burns
returned to PBS with "Unforgivable Blackness: The Rise and Fall
of Jack Johnson," a two-part documentary about the former heavyweight
champ. The film confirmed the obvious: the "jockumentary" is in
vogue. Last year, HBO released "Hitler's Pawn," about Jewish high-jumper
Gretel Bergmann's unsuccessful struggle to make Germany's Olympic
team in 1936. This year, two acclaimed sports docs have been released
"Watermarks," directed by Yaron Zilberman, about Jewish women athletes
in Austria during the 1930s, and "Dust to Glory," directed by Dana
Brown, about the Baja 1000 off-road race
with a third, "A League of Ordinary Gentlemen," about pro bowlers,
due out in May.
Add
action . . . Two sports-themed docs were among the entries
at the recent 2005
Sundance Film Festival in Utah. "Murderball," directed by Henry-Alex
Rubin and Dana Adam Shapiro, is about "quadriplegics who play full-contact
rugby in 'Mad Max'-style wheelchairs
overcoming unimaginable obstacles to compete in the Paralympic Games
in Athens, Greece." The film won Sundance's American Documentary
Audience Award. Also premiering at Sundance was "Ring of Fire: The
Emile Griffith Story," directed by Dan Klores and Ron Berger, a
"story of violence, love, sex, politics and media centered around
the life of Griffith, a six-time world welterweight champion." (The
film will air on the USA Network in April.) Finally, according to
Variety (September 16), SpikeTV network is now producing sports
docs, including "Hardwood Dreams 2," which revisits players from
Los Angeles' Morningside High
the focus of a 1994 documentary entitled "Hardwood Dreams,"
ten years later, and "Viva Baseball," also directed by Klores, about
Latino ballplayers.
Last
action . . . Of course, documentaries rarely do well
at the box-office. The
top-grossing sports movie of 2004? "Dodgeball: A True Underdog
Story," with $114 million.
Ice
freeze . . . What's
happening in Michigan? The Tigers have languished below .500 for
more than a decade, the Lions have not made the playoffs since 1999
and the NBA champion Detroit Pistons played host to the "Malice
at the Palace" brawl with the Indiana Pacers. Now, the fortunes
of Michigan's college hockey teams, which have always ranked among
the top in the nation, appear to be in decline. For the second consecutive
season, no university from Michigan qualified for the men's NCAA
Frozen Four. Previously, at least one Michigan team made it
to the Frozen Four from 1991-1999, then from 2001-2003. The last
time Michigan teams had a two-year absence from the Frozen Four
was in 1982 and 1983.

STEVE KETTMANN
| It's
been called the "Ball Four" of the 21st Century. The controversial
book "Juiced: Wild Times, Rampant 'Roids, Smash Hits and How
Baseball Got Big" (Regan Books), has been on every major best-seller
list since its publication in February, in part because ballplayer-turned-author
Jose Canseco, like "Ball Four's" Jim Bouton, a former pitcher,
has dared to expose baseball's "dark side." |
|
 |
| |
|
This
book may be purchased from Amazon.com |
Indeed, Canseco's allegations
about performance-enhancing drugs so roiled the sport that Congress
called special hearings to investigate Major League Baseball's drug
policy.
What few people know
is that journalist Steve Kettmann is the ghostwriter of "Juiced."
Kettmann was a staff writer for the San Francisco Chronicle from
1990-1998, covering the Oakland A's as the paper's beat-writer from
1994-1998. His tenure coincided with Canseco for one year, 1997,
during Canseco's second stint with the A's. Since leaving the newspaper,
Kettmann had written extensively about steroids and other performance-enhancing
drugs for such publications as the New York Times, the New Republic,
and Wired.com. For Juiced, Kettmann interviewed Canseco over a period
of several months, often meeting with the slugger at his San Fernando
Valley home.
It's been a busy time
for the prolific Kettmann. Last year, he wrote "One Day at Fenway:
A Day in the Life of Baseball in America" (Atria Books
see www.kettmann.com).
That book has already made the big screen: the cover of "One Day
at Fenway" can be glimpsed briefly in the new film "Fever Pitch."
SportsLetter spoke with Kettmann, by phone, from his home in Brooklyn.
David Davis
SportsLetter: How well did you know Jose Canseco when he played
with the A's in 1997?
Steve Kettmann: A good
friend of mine on the A's beat was a guy named Pedro Gomez, who
at the time was covering the team for the Sacramento Bee and is
now an on-air reporter for ESPN. Pedro had gone to high school with
Jose in Miami, at Coral Park High, and so they knew each other.
There were times in 1997 when Pedro and I would run into Jose on
the road, and we would hang out and talk a bit. It was a little
different than the whole routine of being a reporter and asking
a ballplayer a question.
SL: What was your opinion
of Canseco then?
SK: As a reporter, I
remember being struck that Jose was a more interesting quote than
most anyone I talked to. A much, much more interesting quote than
Mark McGwire, for example, because he understood what a reporter
wanted. timing was interesting because, previously with the A's,
Jose had been the best player in baseball. By 1997, he wasn't anywhere
near that. This was nothing like his 40-40 year [when Canseco had
40 home runs and 40 stolen bases]. He still cared as much about
winning and losing, but he was aware that he was getting along in
his career.
SL: When you were covering
baseball then, did you suspect that many of the players were taking
performance-enhancing drugs?
SK: When I started in
1994, I don't think steroids were on my radar at all. What I remember
is one spring training, when Jason Giambi and Mark McGwire were
both on the team and were very good friends, Giambi came to camp
way thicker than the year before. It was like he had another layer
on him. And, in front of us all at Papago Park [the A's facility
in Arizona], McGwire joked about Giambi's "spare tire." At the time,
every sportswriter
and even those of us who've reported on this issue a lot
went through the experience of having trouble putting it all altogether.
There is just a part of you that always had trouble believing it.
One thing about baseball
is that, even people who've never covered baseball think they're
experts. I think it relates to a lot of us growing up with the sport.
I played Little League for many years. I went to A's and Giants
games with my brothers. You feel like you know the game. And the
game that I knew had nothing to do with steroids. So, it always
seemed like a foreign element
like, what does not belong in this picture. You mentally want to
edit it out of the picture, even if you know it's there.
SL: Why do you think the
media ignored this story at the time?
SK: The mentality [on
a newspaper beat] is that your bosses don't want you to burn bridges.
They want you, as a beat writer, to be the one that's around, to
have access, to get answers to questions. They don't want you pushing
the envelope on reporting. In no way is that an excuse. When I look
back, I'm critical of myself
that I should have raised these questions more. I should have asked
more and written more about it
and others should have as well. We should have definitely raised
the question more. So, any criticism I make of anyone else has to
start with criticism with myself.
For example, in 1997,
I asked Jason Giambi directly about having used "andro" and what
it was like taking it. He talked to me a little bit about it. He
said it wasn't any big deal
he'd used it some and then he stopped. But I should have asked Giambi
if he had used steroids. I should have said, "Have you experimented
with anabolic steroids, Jason." He would have been mad. He might
have refused to talk to me after that. He might have told other
players not to talk to me. But I feel I should have done that.
I also remember during
my first two weeks with the A's, I was talking with Mark McGwire.
He looked me up and down and then urged me to try the MET-RX stuff
he had in his locker. He meant it in a friendly way. The point is,
if I had expressed more interest and looked into it and talked to
him about it, I could have established a dialogue with him about
supplements. I think there's a mind-set in sports-writing where
people think if they've studied up on a player's on-base percentage
and know who was the rookie of year in 1972, that they know a lot.
Most good baseball reporters
including the ones whom I consider the best two, Roger Angell of
the New Yorker and Buster Olney, now with ESPN The Magazine
talk about how much they don't know. If you remember how much you
don't know and ask questions, then you would probably have asked
questions about steroids and other performance enhancing drugs.
SL: In writing the book,
you spent a lot of time with Jose: did you ever feel that he was
doing it for the money or that he had an axe to grind?
SK: I have not seen
any detailed information on Canseco's finances. But I never got
a sense of him being in financial need. He lives in this mansion
in Encino, where he just did all this work on the house, with a
big waterfall and pool. He's living a very comfortable life and
driving very nice cars. I also know, from other sources, that he's
made some good investments over the years. Now, did he have an axe
to grind? Canseco feels that he was made an example of by baseball
to send a message to other players about steroids. He felt that
he had been treated unfairly by people in baseball and that they
had some things to answer for. A lot of people dispute his allegations
as paranoid and delusional. But based on how defensive baseball
has been on the steroid issue in the last few months, I don't think
Canseco's position should be dismissed out of hand.
SL: Canseco has contradicted
himself on a couple of points since the publication of the book
- one point being his retreat from stating that steroids, if taken
under a doctor's care, are okay to take. Has that hurt his credibility?
SK: My impression on
that is that Canseco's position has evolved. I haven't spoken to
him in a while
he's doing a reality TV show for VH-1. He and I had many conversations
on this theme
about how, in the future, as we learn more about steroids, a large
number of people who are in their 40s, 50s, and 60s will be using
them in ways to be more youthful or have more physica |